Discussion Board‎ > ‎

The Core of Librarianship

posted Mar 16, 2012, 9:14 AM by Josh Hogan   [ updated Mar 16, 2012, 9:27 AM ]

I've been thinking a lot about what is at the core of librarianship. What are the things we do that are unique to us as librarians? What value do we add to the enterprise of higher education? What do students and faculty expect from us? What makes us consider ourselves librarians?

These questions have become more urgent for me in recent months as the Community Colleges of Spokane have initiated a reorganization of our library services. As of July 1, 2012, CCS Libraries will be one, unified, district-wide service and not the three separate services (Spokane Falls CC, Spokane CC, and the Institute for Extended Learning). These changes are proceeding with the usual mix of intense interest and anxiety attendant on such undertakings. What will happen to our services? Is my job safe? Who's going to cover the reference desk on weekends? Will I have to work at two separate library buildings across town from each other? The lists of possible problems can go on and on.

It isn't my intention to write here about all of the bad things that may or may not happen. Rather, I'd like to ask questions about the core activities and services that make us librarians and our buildings libraries. Change can present some difficult times, but it can also give us an opportunity to choose more deliberately the priorities that we wish to pursue. As a librarian at Spokane Falls, my focus will be more on the issues and opportunities we have identified in that setting.

Currently, the librarians at SFCC work in an environment that some have labeled a "Learning Commons." We share a desk with IT help staff and their work studies, and all of our reference desk work is done in a busy, loud environment. The bulk of the questions revolve around technology issues: how do I print double-sided, why isn't my print coming out of the printer, how can I get page numbers in my word document, can you help me scan this document, etc. While we do still get some reference questions in a more traditional sense, this has become increasingly rare. Part of the reason, I believe, is that we are trying to be everything to everyone. We are fixing printers, scanning documents, helping with margins on Word, logging mobile devices onto the network, and generally behaving as though we are IT technicians.

Don't get me wrong. I believe that librarians should be tech savvy, and I don't mind helping out when necessary. However, I did not become a librarian to provide IT support. I became a librarian to be an educator. I am there to help students with research strategies, developing critical thinking skills, find the best resources to fit their learning needs, identify good websites, cite sources properly, etc. I'm not there to clear paper jams from the printer, which is, unfortunately, located right next to the reference side of the desk, not the IT help side of the desk. I'm not there to connect laptops to our wireless network. I'm not there to clean up formatting problems in Word. Nevertheless, I spend an increasing amount of my time putting out IT fires, when I could be helping faculty develop assignments with IL components, making online tutorials, creating timely workshops for both students and faculty, attending meetings with my liaison departments more regularly, pursuing professional development, and other important parts of being a professional librarian.

This reorganization, I hope, will provide us with the opportunity to define more clearly the core competencies that distinguish us within the library and on campus. How best do we provide reference services in our setting without become adjunct IT technicians? How many hours do we really need to put in at a desk. We are open 67 hours a week, but we have only 2 librarians who can cover these hours. How is that going to work as we move forward? I believe we can do a better job if we find a way to get to the core of librarianship. Perhaps that will mean moving the reference desk to clearly delineate its role in the library. Perhaps it will mean providing in-person reference only during the busiest hours and being "on call" during less busy hours. Maybe it will mean a different model.

In closing, I open up the question to the rest of you: what is core to our profession? What are the activities and services that are essential to what we do? What things can (or should) we drop? How do you staff your reference desk while still maintaining other services?

Comments